The recent arrest of Pakistan’s former Prime Minister, Imran Khan, under dubious circumstances, has triggered a wave of concern and anxiety not just within Pakistan but across the world. The article by respected journalist Peter Oborne offers a comprehensive insight into the situation, and there is much to be considered here.

Imran Khan: A Man of Principles

First and foremost, it’s crucial to understand what Imran Khan represents in the political landscape of Pakistan. Unlike the prevalent culture of corruption and political opportunism, Khan stood out as a beacon of integrity and principle. He dared to challenge the corrupt two-party system that had a stronghold over Pakistani politics.

His efforts to limit politicians’ profiteering from official gifts and his dedication to upholding the rule of law were not mere showmanship; they were representative of his genuine commitment to a fairer, more transparent political system.

The Double Standard of the West

What’s glaringly evident is the blatant double standard demonstrated by the West, particularly the United States and Britain. While they were quick to condemn Russia’s conviction of opposition leader Alexei Navalny, they have remained conspicuously silent on Imran Khan’s politically motivated imprisonment.

This silence doesn’t just expose a flaw in their foreign policy; it raises alarming questions about their commitment to democratic values, human rights, and justice. Khan’s persecution appears to be another example of global powers selectively endorsing democracy only when it serves their interests.

The U.S. and Its Preferential Treatment

The U.S.’s approach towards Pakistan’s leaders has always been biased towards those who were more amenable to its interests. From Ayub Khan to Pervez Musharraf, the U.S. has repeatedly aligned itself with rulers who were more malleable to its foreign policy agenda.

This has often come at the expense of true democracy, with the U.S. ignoring or even opposing leaders who dared to strike an independent stance. Khan’s fall from grace, particularly after his bold defiance over issues such as Afghan state assets and Pakistani airspace, appears to be a continuation of this pattern.

The Role of the Pakistani Establishment

Within Pakistan, there is a widely held belief that the establishment has played a significant role in Khan’s downfall. The politicization of the army and its influence in national politics must be critically assessed. While it has contributed to maintaining stability, its role in shaping political outcomes is problematic.

Justice and Sovereignty

Given this complex backdrop, it is essential to make the following appeals:

1. Justice for Imran Khan: The international community must pressure the legal authorities in Pakistan to ensure a fair and transparent legal process for Imran Khan. If the charges are indeed politically motivated, he should be released and allowed to participate in the upcoming general elections.
2. Respect for Pakistan’s Sovereignty: World leaders must recognize that Pakistan has the right to an independent foreign policy. Interfering with its political process or exerting undue influence undermines the democratic principles that the international community claims to uphold.
3. The Need for a Free and Fair Election: The people of Pakistan should be allowed to choose their leader without interference from within or outside the country. Holding elections without Khan, who is still immensely popular, would only result in a hollow victory for whoever wins.

Let Pakistan Decide Its Destiny

Imran Khan’s arrest isn’t merely a legal or political issue within Pakistan; it’s a reflection of the broader struggle for justice, independence, and democratic integrity. The world must stand up for these values not selectively but universally.

Justice for Imran Khan isn’t just about one man or one country; it’s about standing up for principles that are essential for a fair and just global order. It’s time to allow Pakistan to chart its course, free from interference and manipulation, and let the people decide their destiny. Only then can we hope for a future where the rule of law and the principles of democracy are respected and upheld.